one of the biggest mistakes i see: agencies going all-in on Google or all-in on Outlook.
single-provider setups collapse when that provider updates its filtering models. i watched it happen in late 2025 when Google dropped new deliverability policies. agencies that were 100% Google got wiped overnight. campaigns that had been working for months suddenly hit 100% spam rates.
i call it the Two-Lane Provider Strategy. you split your sending infrastructure between Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 (Outlook), so when one provider tightens its filters, your other lane keeps running.
configuration 1: the 70/30 split (recommended for most teams)
| Provider | Volume Share | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Google Workspace | 70% | B2B audiences on Gmail/Google Workspace |
| Microsoft 365 | 30% | Corporate audiences on Outlook/Exchange |
use this when your ICP is primarily Gmail-based (startups, agencies, tech companies). Google handles the bulk, Outlook provides the safety net.
configuration 2: the 50/50 split (recommended for enterprise targets)
| Provider | Volume Share | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Google Workspace | 50% | Mixed audiences |
| Microsoft 365 | 50% | Even distribution of risk |
use this when your ICP includes larger companies where Outlook/Exchange is the default. equal distribution means neither provider carries disproportionate risk.
your sending domains should look like legitimate business domains that a real company would own.
if your main domain is premiuminboxes.com, good lookalikes would be domains like getpremium or premium-team because they look like legitimate brands that a real company might own.
on the other hand, domains like premiumoffer123 or premium-outreach-mail are obvious red flags because providers check domain patterns and will treat anything that looks disposable as suspicious.